返回

Prompts for Finding New Businesses

Most Recent
Feature Launches
10.24.26
0
分钟

Build me a target list of 100 brands worth pitching

‍

The prompt

‍

Preview

You have the SmartScout MCP connected. we are an Amazon agency — we do full-service management: retail media/ads, listing content and catalog, review velocity, and marketplace strategy. We have no outbound sales team and want a data-backed target list.

Build me a prospect hit list of 100 brands that show clear, fixable underperformance on Amazon right now. Screen on signals like: declining revenue or subcategory market share over the trailing 6–12 months, weak paid presence relative to category peers, low review counts or ratings versus competing ASINs, thin or stale listing content, and unprotected/contested buy box. Prioritize brands large enough to afford agency fees but not so large they already have a sophisticated internal team — roughly $2M–$50M annual Amazon revenue.

Output in two parts:

Part 1 — Top 5, detailed. For each: brand, category, est. annual Amazon revenue, the specific decline or gap with numbers, which our service fixes it, the outreach angle in one or two sentences, and what to say in the first email.

Part 2 — Top 100, table. Brand, category, est. revenue, trailing trend, primary weakness, primary agency service fit. One row each, no commentary.

State your screening criteria and thresholds before you start pulling so I can adjust.

‍

Three techniques doing the heavy lifting here.


Say who you are and what you sell.
Listing the four service lines is why every prospect comes back matched to a specific service instead of a generic "needs help."

Ask for the criteria before the work.
The last line is the most useful sentence in the prompt. You get the thresholds first, adjust them, and only then does it go pull 100 brands. Without it you find out the screen was wrong after the output exists.

Ask for two tiers.
Five worked in full plus 100 in a table gives you something to act on Monday and something to work through for a quarter.
‍

What you get back


A screened list of 100 brands in a $3M to $20M revenue band with trailing declines from 3% to 40%, across four categories, plus the top five worked all the way to a written first email.

The screen states its own thresholds up front: revenue band, decline range, a minimum catalog of 10 products and 100 reviews to exclude noise, and a manual exclusion of brands owned by major CPG or luxury parents. That last filter is what makes the list usable, since a brand inside a large parent is not an agency's buyer.
‍

What makes the top five worth reading


Each one names the specific fixable gap with a number attached. Competitors bidding a brand's own name to more than 4x the generic category rate while the brand spends 1.7% of revenue on ads against a 3 to 6% norm. A brand sitting at 3.98 stars, below the threshold where conversion falls off, spending 0.30% of revenue on ads. A brand with 4.78 stars across 125,791 reviews spending $3,142 a year on advertising, which is proven conversion with no traffic engine attached.

That last framing is the interesting one. It is not a rescue pitch, it is pure upside, and it reads completely differently in a first email.
‍

The integrity move


The report checks declines against prior-year monthly comps to rule out seasonality, and where those comps were not available it says so and marks the trend unconfirmed rather than quietly counting it. One gift-heavy brand went from $4.50M in December to $182K in June, which looks catastrophic and is mostly a calendar. The entry stands on its ad gap instead. Worth copying that habit, because a prospect will absolutely know their own seasonality.

‍

Preview
Prospecting reference

Amazon prospect hit list — declining mid-market brands

One hundred brands doing $3M–$20M on Amazon with a trailing revenue decline and at least one diagnosable gap: underfunded paid, a rating under the conversion threshold, thin review depth, or missing catalog and storefront coverage. Five are worked in full, with the numbers and a first email.

Data sourceAmazon US marketplace
Revenue history throughMid-July 2026
100Brands screened in
$3M–$20MTTM revenue band
−3% to −40%Trailing 12-mo MoM trend
4Categories in scope

Screening criteria

Composite scored on depth of trailing decline, ad spend as % of TTM revenue, average rating, reviews per ASIN, and storefront presence.

FilterThresholdField
Revenue band$3M – $20M TTMTrailing 12-month revenue
Trailing decline−3% to −40%Average 12-month MoM growth
Real catalog≥ 10 productsTotal products
Real review base> 100 reviewsTotal reviews
CategoriesBeauty & Personal Care, Home & Kitchen, Health & Household, Grocery & Gourmet FoodPrimary category

Excluded manually

Brands owned by major CPG or luxury parents, and rows with visible category misclassification.

P&GUnileverReckittHaleonCotyL'OréalEstée LauderPepsiCoMondelezHersheyConagraMcCormickChurch & DwightNewell
Part 1

Top 5, worked in detail

1

Beachwaver

Hair curling irons · Beauty
Est. annual revenue$13.2M
Trailing trend−35.9%Verified vs. prior-year comps

Year-over-year monthly comps

Month2025/26 currentPrior year same monthChange
Dec$2.32M$5.57M−58%
Feb$553K$1.13M−51%
Mar$635K$1.49M−57%
Jun$501K$885K−43%

Every month from Dec 2025 forward is below the same month a year earlier. This is not seasonality — the year-ago comparison controls for it.

The gap, with numbers

Ad Spy shows "beach waver curling iron" pulling 35,360 monthly searches at an estimated CPC of $8.48 (range $6.36–$10.60), with 20 brands actively advertising on it. Generic "curling iron" clears at $1.99. Competitors have bid Beachwaver's own brand term to more than 4x the category rate. Total ad spend is $227K against $13.2M TTM — 1.7% of revenue, well under the 3–6% category norm. They are being conquested on their own name and not defending it.

Retail mediaDefensive brand-term campaigns first

Outreach angle

Twenty brands are paying up to $10.60 a click to intercept people searching for Beachwaver by name, and Beachwaver isn't bidding hard enough to hold the top slot. That's the cheapest revenue in the account to win back.

First email

Subject: 20 brands are bidding on "beachwaver" — you're not top slot

Hi [name],

I pulled Amazon ad data on your category this week. "Beach waver curling iron" gets about 35,000 searches a month, and 20 brands are currently bidding on it — CPC is running $6–$10 versus $1.99 for generic "curling iron." That premium exists because people are typing your name and competitors are paying to get in front of them.

Your Amazon revenue is down roughly 45–55% year over year across Feb through June. Some of that is category, but branded-term leakage is the part that's fixable in about 30 days.

Worth 20 minutes? I'll walk you through the keyword data — no deck.

[signature]

2

Frownies

Eye wrinkle pads & patches · Beauty
Est. annual revenue$19.5M
Trailing trend−25.5%Verified vs. monthly series

Monthly revenue series

MonthRevenue USDNote
Sep 2025$1.78MBaseline
Nov 2025$2.47MHoliday peak
Apr 2026$1.19MNo recovery
Jun 2026$1.08M−39% vs. Sep

No month after November recovers to the September starting level. June is the weakest complete month in the window.

The gap, with numbers

Average rating 3.98 across 56,095 reviews — the lowest rating of any brand in this revenue band in the set, and below the 4.2 threshold where Amazon conversion falls off sharply. Ad spend is $57,497 on $19.5M TTM: 0.30% of revenue, roughly a tenth of category norm. Catalog is only 20 products for a $19.5M brand.

Review velocityRetail media, second

Outreach angle

A 130-year-old brand doing nearly $20M on Amazon with a 3.98 rating is leaving conversion on the table on every session — and at 0.30% ad spend, they're not buying traffic either. Both are fixable without touching the product.

First email

Subject: Frownies is at 3.98 stars — that's the whole conversion problem

Hi [name],

Frownies is doing close to $20M a year on Amazon, which is remarkable for a 20-SKU catalog. But you're sitting at 3.98 stars across 56,000 reviews, and 4.2 is roughly where Amazon's conversion curve breaks. Every point of traffic you get converts worse than it should.

The other half: your Amazon ad spend looks like about 0.3% of revenue. Category peers run 3–6%. So you're converting below par on traffic you're barely buying.

Your revenue is down about 39% from September to June. I think a meaningful chunk of that is these two things, not demand.

Can I show you the numbers? 20 minutes.

[signature]

3

THE COMFY

Wearable blankets · Home & Kitchen
Est. annual revenue$14.4M
Trailing trend−8.5%Unconfirmed — see caveat

Trend caveat

This brand is heavily gift-seasonal — Dec 2025 peaked at $4.50M against $182K in June 2026. Prior-year monthly comps were unavailable, so seasonal decay cannot be separated from true decline. Treat the trend as unconfirmed; the ad gap stands on its own.

Dec 2025$4.50M
Jun 2026$182K

The gap, with numbers

Total ad spend of $3,142 against $14.4M TTM revenue — 0.02% of revenue, the lowest ratio of any brand in the 100-brand set. Meanwhile the brand holds a 4.78 average rating across 125,791 reviews, the strongest rating/review profile in the top 5. They have earned the social proof and are buying almost no traffic to put in front of it.

Retail mediaBuilt from zero

Outreach angle

A 4.78-star brand with 125,000 reviews spending $3,000 a year on Amazon ads is the rarest thing in the category — proven conversion with no traffic engine attached. Paid is pure upside here, not a rescue.

First email

Subject: 4.78 stars, 125k reviews, $3k in ad spend

Hi [name],

THE COMFY has one of the best review profiles I've seen in home goods on Amazon — 4.78 stars across 125,000+ reviews. That's the hard part, and you've already done it.

What caught my attention is that your Amazon ad spend appears to be around $3,000 against roughly $14M in sales. Most brands your size run 3–6% of revenue. You're at a fraction of a percent.

That's unusual, and it's good news: when conversion is already proven, paid traffic is additive rather than a gamble. Given how seasonal your business is, there's a case for building this before Q4 rather than during it.

Open to a short call?

[signature]

4

EYE-VAC

Canister vacuum cleaners · Home & Kitchen
Est. annual revenue$14.7M
Trailing trend−8.7%Field-based, not verified

Signals

Ad spend$47,0940.32% of revenue
Average rating4.6333,069 reviews
Catalog29products
Category paid norm3–6%of revenue

The gap, with numbers

Strong conversion signal, near-zero paid support, and a narrow SKU footprint in a category where variant coverage drives share. Ad spend $47,094 on $14.7M TTM = 0.32% of revenue; rating 4.63 across 33,069 reviews; catalog thin at 29 products.

Retail mediaCatalog & variation expansion, phase two

Outreach angle

4.63 stars and 0.32% ad spend means EYE-VAC wins every comparison it's actually shown in — it just isn't being shown. Paid plus wider variant coverage is a straightforward share play.

First email

Subject: EYE-VAC converts well — it's just not getting shown

Hi [name],

Quick observation from Amazon category data: EYE-VAC holds a 4.63 rating across 33,000 reviews, which is above most of the canister vacuum set. But your ad spend looks like roughly 0.3% of revenue, and you're running about 29 SKUs.

Translation: when a shopper sees you next to a competitor, you tend to win. The problem is how rarely that comparison happens.

Revenue is off modestly over the trailing year. I'd argue that's a visibility problem rather than a product one, and it's the more fixable of the two.

Worth a conversation?

[signature]

5

Nextmug by Nextboom

Tea & espresso beverage warmers · Home & Kitchen
Est. annual revenue$15.1M
Trailing trend−10.5%Field-based, not verified

Signals

Ad spend$23,4030.15% of revenue
Average rating4.25At the threshold
Total reviews7,654365 per ASIN
Catalog21products

The gap, with numbers

Rating 4.25 is right at the conversion threshold, and low for a premium-priced device. Only 7,654 total reviews across 21 products — thin for a brand at this revenue, which suggests review velocity has not kept pace with sales volume. Ad spend is 0.15% of revenue.

Review velocityListing content, then retail media

Outreach angle

$15M on a 21-SKU catalog with only 7,600 reviews and a 4.25 rating — the sales are there but the social proof and the paid engine are both underbuilt, which is why the trend has turned.

First email

Subject: $15M in sales, 7,600 reviews — that ratio is the issue

Hi [name],

Nextmug is doing around $15M a year on Amazon across about 21 SKUs. Impressive. But you've only accumulated ~7,600 reviews, and you're sitting at 4.25 stars.

For a premium-priced device, both of those numbers are working against you at the moment of decision — shoppers comparing warmers see thinner social proof than your actual sales volume would suggest, and 4.25 is right at the edge where Amazon conversion softens.

Your ad spend also looks like about 0.15% of revenue, so there's not much pushing against it.

Revenue is down roughly 10% over the trailing year. I think review velocity is the highest-leverage fix. Can I show you what I'm seeing?

[signature]

Part 2

The full 100

PaidAd spend under ~1% of revenue
RatingAverage rating below 4.30
ReviewsThin reviews per ASIN
ContentNo Brand Store, catalog gaps
StrategyDecline steeper than 25%, paid already funded

100 of 100 brands

#BrandAmazon USCategoryprimaryEst. revenueTTM, USDTrendavg 12-mo MoMPrimary weaknessdiagnosedService fitlead motion
1BeachwaverBeauty$13.2M−35.9%Paid — branded-term conquestingRetail media
2FrowniesBeauty$19.5M−25.5%Rating 3.98Review velocity
3THE COMFYHome & Kitchen$14.4M−8.5%Paid — 0.02% of revRetail media
4EYE-VACHome & Kitchen$14.7M−8.7%Paid — 0.32% of revRetail media
5Nextmug by NextboomHome & Kitchen$15.1M−10.5%Reviews + rating 4.25Review velocity
6TouchstoneHome & Kitchen$19.1M−39.4%StrategyMarketplace strategy
7FEZIBOHome & Kitchen$14.9M−38.2%StrategyMarketplace strategy
8WhatsBeddingHome & Kitchen$16.4M−36.9%StrategyMarketplace strategy
9MeteneHealth & Household$15.3M−36.5%StrategyMarketplace strategy
10YoobureHome & Kitchen$19.4M−35.8%Paid — 0.16% of revRetail media
11Lush DecorHome & Kitchen$15.3M−35.9%Content — 1,869 SKUsCatalog & content
12DMIHealth & Household$19.4M−34.8%Rating 4.19Listing content
13OLOVBeauty$12.4M−34.6%Rating 4.10Listing content
14ClaiksHome & Kitchen$16.0M−33.8%Reviews — 8,996 totalReview velocity
15iDOOHome & Kitchen$18.2M−33.5%StrategyMarketplace strategy
16VINEVIDAHome & Kitchen$14.4M−33.0%Content — 3,188 SKUs, 4.16Catalog & content
17JXQTLINGMUHome & Kitchen$17.9M−32.3%Reviews — 6,079 totalReview velocity
18RugshopHome & Kitchen$17.1M−32.0%Content — 1,300 SKUsCatalog & content
19IaerllltBeauty$10.0M−31.4%Paid — 0.31% of revRetail media
20LotFancyHealth & Household$15.9M−31.3%StrategyMarketplace strategy
21EZY DOSEHealth & Household$16.4M−30.8%Rating 4.34Listing content
22WelmateHealth & Household$15.4M−30.6%StrategyMarketplace strategy
23TheraICE RxHealth & Household$18.3M−30.5%Paid — 0.42% of revRetail media
24Celtic Sea SaltGrocery$13.1M−30.0%Content — no storefrontCatalog & content
25BitvaeHealth & Household$16.8M−28.3%Paid — 0.20% of revRetail media
26SamnyteBeauty$8.8M−28.1%StrategyMarketplace strategy
27ComfiLifeHealth & Household$19.7M−28.2%Paid — 0.82% of revRetail media
28GenexaHealth & Household$17.6M−25.0%Paid — 0.93% of revRetail media
29Kurt S. AdlerHome & Kitchen$16.3M−25.0%Paid — 0.03% of revRetail media
30AfloiaHome & Kitchen$14.9M−25.3%StrategyMarketplace strategy
31YizoshHome & Kitchen$18.4M−24.5%Reviews — 10,958 totalReview velocity
32iPormisHome & Kitchen$18.6M−24.1%Reviews — 17,067 totalReview velocity
33BUNNHome & Kitchen$18.4M−23.4%Paid — 0.17% of revRetail media
34Willow TreeHome & Kitchen$18.7M−22.5%Paid — 0.14% of revRetail media
35Pure Daily CareBeauty$17.1M−21.9%Paid — 0.15% of revRetail media
36btartboxnailsBeauty$16.9M−21.4%ContentCatalog & content
37BellemaveHome & Kitchen$19.4M−21.3%Content — 1,858 SKUs, 4.18Catalog & content
38FP FLEXPEDICHome & Kitchen$14.7M−21.0%Reviews — 2,232 totalReview velocity
39JUMMICOHome & Kitchen$18.4M−20.3%Paid — 0.08% of revRetail media
40WhitmorHome & Kitchen$17.5M−19.2%Paid — 0.26% of revRetail media
41FruidlesGrocery$15.1M−18.3%Rating 3.81Listing content
42RestaurantwareHealth & Household$17.3M−17.9%Content — 4,373 SKUsCatalog & content
43Queen of the ThronesBeauty$11.2M−17.5%Rating 4.26Listing content
44Humble CrewHome & Kitchen$17.0M−17.5%Paid — 0.15% of revRetail media
45puredownHome & Kitchen$17.9M−17.2%Paid — 0.54% of revRetail media
46mopioHome & Kitchen$14.9M−17.2%Reviews — 9,522 totalReview velocity
47StashGrocery$13.7M−16.8%Paid — 0.94% of revRetail media
48EudeleHome & Kitchen$19.7M−16.5%ContentCatalog & content
49Crazy CupsGrocery$15.8M−16.2%Rating 4.28Listing content
50Plant TherapyHealth & Household$15.1M−15.9%Content — 603 SKUsCatalog & content
51ThoughtfullyGrocery$14.5M−15.9%Paid — 0.49% of revRetail media
52MeridianBeauty$12.5M−15.6%Rating 4.19Listing content
53IQAirHome & Kitchen$16.0M−14.8%Reviews — 6,606 totalReview velocity
54SturGrocery$10.8M−14.5%Rating 4.28Listing content
55Hawaiian Shaved IceGrocery$15.4M−14.2%Paid — 0.79% of revRetail media
56Zenwise HealthHealth & Household$18.7M−14.2%Content — 26 SKUsCatalog & content
57Benchmark BouquetsGrocery$16.8M−14.0%Rating 4.03Listing content
58PERLECAREHome & Kitchen$15.6M−13.6%Reviews — 15,772 totalReview velocity
59ZOAGrocery$14.6M−13.0%Reviews — 7,168 totalReview velocity
60BestMassageBeauty$15.4M−12.6%Paid — 0.005% of revRetail media
61SOLEHealth & Household$15.6M−12.6%Reviews — 8,051 totalReview velocity
62Power CrunchHealth & Household$15.3M−12.5%Content — no storefrontCatalog & content
63Seville ClassicsHome & Kitchen$15.6M−12.0%Paid — 0.04% of revRetail media
64Nielsen-MasseyGrocery$10.5M−11.9%Paid — 1.78% of revRetail media
65EARTHLITEBeauty$12.4M−11.8%Paid + no storefrontRetail media
66Puleo InternationalHome & Kitchen$14.8M−11.8%Paid — $0 spendRetail media
67UbrooBeauty$10.8M−11.5%Reviews — 3,153 totalReview velocity
68NEATERIZEHome & Kitchen$16.2M−10.8%Paid — 0.45% of revRetail media
69Mia SecretBeauty$11.6M−10.8%Paid — 0.02% of revRetail media
70Prince Of PeaceGrocery$14.6M−10.2%Paid — 0.008% of revRetail media
71BELLEZEHome & Kitchen$18.4M−9.8%Paid — 0.07% of revRetail media
72City BeautyBeauty$9.6M−9.3%Rating 3.89Listing content
73SkinSmart AntimicrobialBeauty$18.4M−9.1%Content — 14 SKUsCatalog & content
74FHI HeatBeauty$15.8M−9.1%Paid — 0.87% of revRetail media
75CHARMKINGHealth & Household$17.9M−8.9%Paid — 0.46% of revRetail media
76RMSHealth & Household$15.5M−8.4%Rating 4.52 / catalogCatalog & content
77NuFACEBeauty$9.6M−8.7%Reviews — 4,619 totalReview velocity
78Real RelaxBeauty$19.4M−14.3%Reviews — 9,259 totalReview velocity
79Omaha SteaksGrocery$9.5M−7.6%Reviews — 1,314 totalReview velocity
80GenCareHealth & Household$15.8M−7.5%Content — 27 SKUsCatalog & content
81KeraniqueBeauty$10.2M−7.7%Paid — 1.04% of revRetail media
82CRAVEBOXGrocery$11.7M−7.2%Rating 4.27Listing content
83VAVALASHBeauty$9.0M−7.2%Content — 1,866 SKUsCatalog & content
84b.tanBeauty$11.4M−6.8%Rating 4.24Listing content
85HotopHome & Kitchen$16.5M−6.4%Content — 1,732 SKUsCatalog & content
86BodumHome & Kitchen$14.8M−6.4%Rating 4.32Listing content
87BBTOHealth & Household$18.0M−6.0%Content — 1,494 SKUsCatalog & content
88Base LaboratoriesBeauty$15.1M−6.0%StrategyMarketplace strategy
89We Got NutsGrocery$9.5M−5.8%Paid — 1.01% of revRetail media
90ZacurateHealth & Household$18.2M−5.5%Content — 11 SKUsCatalog & content
91RugcomfHome & Kitchen$15.2M−5.3%Reviews — 17,147 totalReview velocity
92Great Bay HomeHome & Kitchen$17.8M−5.1%Paid — 0.16% of revRetail media
93PompeianGrocery$18.4M−4.8%Paid — 0.91% of revRetail media
94UmbraHome & Kitchen$16.2M−4.3%Paid — 0.98% of revRetail media
95MorovanBeauty$11.0M−3.8%Paid — 0.18% of revRetail media
96IvilonHome & Kitchen$15.7M−3.7%Paid — 0.45% of revRetail media
97SeoulCeuticalsBeauty$10.9M−3.6%Paid — 0.76% of revRetail media
98The Republic of TeaGrocery$20.0M−3.1%Content — no storefrontCatalog & content
99BruderHealth & Household$19.3M−3.1%Paid — 0.69% of revRetail media
100L'ANZABeauty$12.4M−3.0%Content — no storefrontCatalog & content

‍

Data it touches


Brand search across the revenue band, market share and subcategory trend, product research on catalog and review depth, ad spy for spend and CPC, search term volumes.
‍

Go deeper
‍

  • Re-run the screen with the revenue band at [RANGE] and tell me what changes
    ‍
  • Rank all 100 by how fast the primary gap could be fixed
    ‍
  • Pull the full teardown on the top three before I reach out
    ‍
  • Which of these have contested buy boxes, and who is on the listings
    ‍

Where it gets soft


Revenue, ad spend, and CPC are estimates, so a brand near a threshold may not belong in the band at all. Widen the range rather than trusting the edges.

A trailing decline is not automatically a problem to sell against. It can be seasonality, a deliberate SKU exit, a channel shift, or a parent-company decision, and the brand knows which. Check prior-year comps before treating any decline as a finding, and say so when you cannot.

Category norms like a 3 to 6% ad spend benchmark are reasonable rules of thumb rather than measured figures from this dataset. Present them as context, not as the brand's own number.

‍

以无风险价格开始使用 SmartScout

立即试用
7 天退款保证,随时取消